26 of the Worst Rated TVs (Tested by Experts) Summer 2024

Christen da Costa Avatar
Christen da Costa Avatar

By

Our editorial process is built on human expertise, ensuring that every article is reliable and trustworthy. AI helps us shape our content to be as accurate and engaging as possible.
Learn more about our commitment to integrity in our Code of Ethics.

With 156 TVs analyzed using our True Score, we have a comprehensive understanding of which TVs rank the best and, in this case, the worst. It’s important to note that the “worst” rated TVs aren’t necessarily bad (some are terrible, though); they are simply the lowest rated among recent models, outperformed in tests by many other TVs before or after them. How did we do this?

Gadget Review is known for its True Score, the web’s most accurate product quality rating. The True Score blends expert reviews and human-assessed Trust Ratings with customer feedback to instantly calculate a final score that you can depend on. Read more about it here.

LG UN9000 TV

True Score: 57

Avoid the LG UN9000 TV if you’re looking for strong dark room performance. Its poor black levels, low contrast ratio, and slow response time hinder its overall performance. Despite good reflection handling and a wide viewing angle, it lacks HDMI 2.1 ports and Dolby Vision support.

Samsung Serif TV (2019)

True Score: 58

The Samsung Serif 2019 TV struggles with tight viewing angles and cannot be wall-mounted, making it less flexible in various room setups. Its artistic design and decent smart home integration are overshadowed by the absence of Dolby Vision and poor brightness levels.

Element G Series LED TV

True Score: 60

The Element G Series TV suffers from poor sound quality, no local dimming, and lacks Bluetooth connectivity, diminishing its overall usability. Although it offers balanced, bright colors and a user-friendly Roku OS, it lags during live TV and some games, impacting the viewing experience.

Huawei Vision S TV

True Score: 61

Pro gamers should avoid the Huawei Vision S due to its lack of HDMI 2.1 ports and variable refresh rate support. While it boasts decent color reproduction and fast response times, its poor HDR brightness limits its appeal for those seeking high-quality visual experiences.

SunBriteTV Pro 2 4K TV

True Score: 63

The SunBriteTV Pro 2 4K is not ideal for those looking for smart features or built-in speakers, limiting its functionality. Designed for outdoor use with excellent weatherproofing, it lacks the versatility and advanced features found in other modern TVs. Plus it’s god awful expensive at over $6k.

Hisense U80G 8k TV

True Score: 63

The Hisense U80G’s sluggish UI and sub-par speakers make it less appealing despite its 8K resolution and great color accuracy. Full-array local dimming and Dolby Vision support enhance its picture quality, but its overall performance is hindered by these drawbacks.

Sony X81CH TV

True Score: 68

The Sony X81CH’s clunky interface and poor color gamut detract from its excellent native contrast and minimal motion blur. It is suitable for action movie enthusiasts but falls short for those seeking a more vibrant color experience and a better remote.

LG UP7000 TV

True Score: 68

The LG UP7000’s poor contrast, low peak brightness, and lack of HDMI 2.1 support limit its potential, especially for gamers. It does offer wide viewing angles and excellent upscaling, making it a reasonable choice for general TV viewing.

LG UN7000 TV

True Score: 68

Gamers should steer clear of the LG UN7000 due to its lack of HDMI 2.1 and VRR support. While it provides wide viewing angles and good upscaling, its poor contrast and greyish blacks make it less suitable for dark room viewing.

Sony X75CH TV

True Score: 69

The Sony X75CH’s narrow viewing angles and lack of HDMI 2.1 support make it less desirable for gamers. However, it features excellent native contrast, deep blacks, and great reflection handling, making it a solid entry-level 4K TV for casual viewers.

RCA RTRU5027 4K Roku Smart LED TV

True Score: 70

Hisense H6570G TV

True Score: 70

Avoid the Hisense H6570G for its poor viewing angles and sub-par audio quality. Despite its excellent contrast ratio and easy-to-use Android TV menu, its limited brightness and sound make it less appealing for a high-quality viewing experience.

Toshiba M550 TV

True Score: 70

The Toshiba M550 TV misses variable refresh rate support, making it less ideal for gamers. However, it offers impressive brightness, great contrast, and Amazon Fire TV convenience, making it a strong contender for 4K Fire TV options.

LG Nano81 TV

True Score: 70

The LG Nano81‘s terrible local dimming and low contrast ratio diminish its HDR performance. Despite this, it remains a decent entry-level choice with good viewing angles and great color accuracy once calibrated, suitable for casual viewing.

Konka U5 Android TV

True Score: 71

The Konka U5 Android TV’s poor contrast and backlight bleed issues make it less desirable despite its decent peak brightness and good color coverage. Its Android TV OS and connectivity options make it a good budget 4K HDR TV for casual users.

Insignia NS 43D420NA20 43″ LED TV

True Score: 72

The Insignia NS 43D420NA20 lacks support for 4K and HDR content, limiting its future-proofing. However, it offers good color accuracy, great viewing angles, and decent motion handling, making it suitable for casual TV watchers.

Samsung QN900A 8K QLED TV

True Score: 72

The Samsung QN900A 8K QLED’s significant blooming and low contrast make it less ideal for dark room viewing. Nonetheless, its fantastic brightness and minimal reflections make it a top choice for varied entertainment needs in well-lit environments.

Hisense H9F TV

True Score: 73

The Hisense H9F is let down by mediocre sound and no HDMI 2.1 ports, despite its deep blacks and high peak brightness. It excels in sub-4K content upscaling and vivid color reproduction, making it ok for non-gamers.

TCL 4 Series TV

True Score: 73

The TCL 4 Series struggles with poor viewing angles and low peak brightness. However, its decent contrast, smooth 24FPS playback, and ok reflection handling make it a solid choice for most use cases.

Samsung NU8000

True Score: 74

Avoid the Samsung NU8000 for its poor viewing angles and lack of HDMI 2.1. It does offer good black levels, wide color gamut, and good upscaling, making it suitable for general entertainment but not for gamers.

TCL 5 Series TV

True Score: 74

The TCL 5 Series has low peak brightness and no VRR or HDMI 2.1 support, limiting its appeal for gamers. However, it features deep blacks, HDR support, and fast response times, making it good for general TV viewing.

Insignia F30 DF710NA21 43″ TV

True Score: 75

The Insignia DF710NA21 series is ideal for new Smart TV consumers with its balanced colors and easy menu. However, poor viewing angles and lagging issues make it less suitable for gamers and live sports watchers.

Hisense U6GR TV

True Score: 74

The Hisense U6GR TV’s limited off-center viewing and lack of HDMI 2.1 make it less ideal for wide viewing. However, it boasts great glare-reducing peak brightness, VRR, high contrast ratio, and low input lag, providing superb value for its price.

Sceptre A658CV-U TV

True Score: 74

The Sceptre A658CV-U is not ideal for pro gamers due to its lack of HDMI 2.1 ports and narrow viewing angles. However, it offers fast response times and excellent upscaling, making it a decent entry-level Smart TV.

SunbriteTV Veranda TV 4K Full Shade

True Score: 75

The SunbriteTV Veranda TV 4K Full Shade has low brightness and a limited port selection, making it less versatile. However, it’s perfect for full-shade viewing with great contrast and durability, though other options offer smarter features at a higher price.

LG UN6950 TV

True Score: 75

The LG UN6950 suffers from poor contrast and visible backlight bleed, which hinders its performance in dark environments. However, it offers wide viewing angles and excellent upscaling, making it suitable for general use.

LG UP8000 TV

True Score: 75

The LG UP8000’s substandard contrast ratio and lack of local dimming make its HDR experience underwhelming. Despite this, it provides good viewing angles, great response time, and support for Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos, making it a decent budget 4K TV.

Sony X750H

True Score: 75

The Sony X750H’s insufficient peak brightness and small viewing angles limit its overall performance. However, it delivers fantastic 4K pictures, excellent color accuracy, good motion performance, and decent response times, making it a solid choice for general viewing.

Hisense A4 TV

True Score: 75

The Hisense A4 TV’s lack of 4K resolution and HDR support makes it less suitable for advanced users. However, it offers good native contrast, black levels, and reflection handling, making it a reasonable option for casual users in dark rooms.

Samsung The Sero TV

True Score: 75

Samsung The Sero’s bad black uniformity and mediocre contrast ratio limit its performance in dark room settings. However, its unique rotating screen and excellent reflection handling make it perfect for social media users and bright room environments.


What is the GR True Score?

Gadget Review is known for its True Score, the web’s most accurate product quality rating. The True Score blends expert reviews and human assessed Trust Ratings with customer feedback, underpinned by a sophisticated AI tool. This tool utilizes advanced machine learning algorithms and Bayesian models to analyze and synthesize data, ensuring accurate, unbiased, and comprehensive scoring. You can read more about it here.

Share this Article



About Gadget Review’s Editorial Process

At Gadget Review, our guides, reviews, and news are driven by thorough human expertise and use our Trust Rating system and the True Score. AI assists in refining our editorial process, ensuring that every article is engaging, clear and accurate. See how we write our content here →