If you are looking for the best monitor for Call of Duty, focus on features that cater to fast-paced gameplay. High refresh rates (120Hz or higher) ensure fluid motion, while a response time of 1 ms or less reduces motion blur for clearer visuals. Low input lag (<15ms) is crucial for responsive controls, giving you a competitive edge.
We evaluated over 196 monitors and analyzed 321,839 reviews. The five winning monitors, certified as tested, performed well in our proprietary data-driven True Score metrics. They stood out in image quality, responsiveness, and overall gaming performance. Our process ensures you get a reliable monitor free from fake or low-quality reviews, perfect for intense gaming sessions.
How Did We Rank the Best Monitors for Call of Duty?
Our computer monitor buying guide is the result of extensive research, including the analysis of over 200 websites. We evaluated diverse testing methods, expert reviews, and user feedback to isolate the key factors that matter most. By focusing on 2 required test results, 2 nice-to-have test results, and 1 must-have specifications, we ensure that our true score system reflects the best choices available, catering to your specific needs.
Our commitment to unbiased reviews is powered by our ‘True Score’ system, targeting low quality and fake reviews. When you shop through our links, you’re backing our mission. Dive deeper to see how.
?️ Minimum Specifications
- Must have a refresh rate of more than 120 Hz.
? Test Criteria
- Input Lag: An input lag of less than 15 milliseconds ensures a highly responsive gaming experience with minimal delay between action and on-screen response.
- Contrast Ratio: 1000:1 or higher (infinite), offering deep blacks and bright whites for an exceptional viewing experience.
? “Nice To Haves”
- Fast Response Time: 13ms or less, ensuring smooth transitions without motion blur.
- Color Accuracy: At least 90% of the DCI P3 color gamut, providing rich and vibrant colors.
Latest Updates
- 05/5/2024: Published the list of best monitors for Call of Duty based on our True Score system.
Top Best Monitors for Call of Duty For 2024
Prices accurate at the time of publishing
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Alienware AW2723DF
The Alienware AW2723DF, with its swift response and high refresh rate, is perfect for Call of Duty players prioritizing precision and fluid visuals in fast-paced gameplay.
True Score
87884Experts
92726Customers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $70$649.99$579.99Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Superb image quality
- Low input lag
- High native refresh rate
Reasons to Avoid
- Mediocre contrast ratio
- Adequate response time
- No HDMI 2.1
Specifications
Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers No Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type IPS Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10, HDR600 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 1 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 403 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 1,015 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 93 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 90 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 All Retailers
- $579.99$650Save $70
- $637.99$705Save $67
Our Verdict
Call of Duty is extremely demanding regarding reaction times, and Alienware’s AW2723DF is designed to help you maximize the impact of your reflexes. It boasts an 8.6 ms input lag that drops lower and lower, and you get closer to a 240 Hz refresh rate, which helps reduce the lag between what’s on screen and your own reactions to them. The 4.6 ms response time helps minimize motion blur and ensure quick in-game reactions, so you’re never stuck wondering what you just saw. With support for both G-Sync and FreeSync, this monitor guarantees fluid movement and tear-free visuals, no matter what video card you’ve got in your rig.
The monitor’s 402.8 nits of brightness and 99.6% sRGB coverage help provide vibrant and accurate colors that bring every Call of Duty map to life, even in well-lit environments. However, its 7.6% reflectivity rate advises placement away from direct lighting to avoid potential glare issues.
It also features a flicker-free panel and blue light filter to reduce eye strain during those marathon sessions. These features are welcome beyond just gaming too, and combined with the monitor’s exceptional specs and outstanding performance, it’s great for viewing movies TV shows, and enhancing productivity, thanks to its superior color gamut and contrast.
While the Alienware AW2723DF is a premium product, its swift response times, high refresh rates, and adaptive sync support justify the investment for serious Call of Duty players. Offering balanced excellence in gaming and multimedia capabilities, it is a compelling option for gamers looking to maximize their performance and enjoyment.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Asus ROG PG27AQDM
The Asus ROG PG27AQDM, offering OLED’s exceptional contrast and responsiveness, is a premium pick for Call of Duty enthusiasts seeking top-tier visual quality and performance.
True Score
868910Experts
906kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $45$799.00$754.00Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Stellar Picture Quality
- Fast Response Time
- Low Input Lag
- High Refresh Rate and VRR Support
- Wide Viewing Angles
Reasons to Avoid
- No HDMI 2.1 Support
- Low Overall Brightness
Specifications
Aspect Ratio 16:9 Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers Yes Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type LED Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type OLED Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 0.03 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 26.5″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 311 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 0 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 95 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 90 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 All Retailers
- $754.00$799Save $45
- $754.00$1,451Save $697
Our Verdict
If you’ve got room in the budget for a premium monitor, the Asus ROG PG27AQDM delivers exceptional performance that will improve your experience of every game you play, not just Call of Duty. Its low input lag of 10.8 ms drops further as you move closer to its 240 Hz native refresh rate and helps minimize the delay between what happens on screen and your own reactions. Plus, an excellent 2.1 ms response creates a blur-free experience that won’t leave you guessing at what you just saw. G-Sync and FreeSync integration and the extremely high refresh rate provide a smooth, seamless gaming experience without tearing that would ruin the experience.
With 311.2 nits of brightness and an ultra-low reflectivity of 2%, this monitor remains clear and visible in dim and moderately lit rooms without distracting glare but will struggle in bright spaces. The OLED panel offers exceptional contrast and vibrant color gamut coverage of 99.98% sRGB, ensuring that every detail of the game’s environment is vivid and true to life. A flicker-free panel and blue light filter are included to reduce eye strain during extended play sessions, supporting marathon gaming with comfort.
Beyond its gaming prowess, the Asus ROG PG27AQDM excels in multimedia. It delivers unparalleled color accuracy and a broad color spectrum for an optimal viewing experience across all content.
The PG27AQDM offers an OLED panel with superior contrast, color richness, responsiveness and an OLED panel’s eye-watering price. It’s an expensive investment, but if you’re a competitive CoD player or are aspiring to be one, it’s absolutely worth the investment if you’ve got the budget to spare.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
HP OMEN 27QS
Budget-friendly yet powerful, the HP OMEN 27QS is ideal for Call of Duty players who don’t want to compromise on responsiveness or visual quality for affordability.
True Score
84834Experts
911kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $43$299.99$256.97Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Good Image quality
- Low response time
- Low input lag
- High refresh rate
Reasons to Avoid
- Low contrast ratio
Specifications
Aspect Ratio 16:9 Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers Yes Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type LED Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10, HDR400 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 1 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 390 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 1,014 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 94 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 86 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 All Retailers
- $256.97$300Save $43
- $329.99$429Save $99
- $429.99
Our Verdict
If you’re on a budget and looking for a gaming monitor that delivers the snappy responsiveness you need for Call of Duty, the HP OMEN 27QS is a fantastic value that doesn’t skimp where it matters. With an 8.5 ms input lag and a 4.2 ms response time, it guarantees the responsiveness required for the fast-paced nature of competitive Call of Duty, with minimal delay and no motion blur. The 144 Hz refresh rate, bolstered by both FreeSync and G-Sync, ensures gameplay is smooth and free from visual tearing, ensuring you don’t get distracted by inconsistencies in the picture quality.
The monitor also offers a peak brightness of 389.5 nits, suitable for various lighting conditions, even some bright rooms! With 94.4% DCI P3 and 100% sRGB coverage, visuals are vibrant and accurate, enhancing HDR and SDR content and covering all of your favorite games, not just CoD. Designed with marathon sessions in mind, features like blue light filters and flicker-free displays reduce eye strain, making extended gaming sessions more comfortable.
Beyond Call of Duty, the 27QS excels in multimedia applications, from movie watching to photo editing, thanks to its excellent color accuracy and brightness, making it a versatile addition to any setup.
HP’s OMEN 27QS offers Call of Duty gamers a rare mix of affordability, responsiveness, and visual fidelity. It is an excellent choice for those seeking a high-performing gaming monitor without the high cost, proving you don’t have to break the bank for quality gaming and entertainment experiences.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240
The Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 sets a high bar with its unmatched response time and color accuracy, offering Call of Duty players an edge in competitive gaming environments.
True Score
828310Experts
88334Customers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $300$999.99$699.99Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Excellent OLED Picture Quality
- Ultra-Fast Response Time
- Low Input Lag
- High Refresh Rate and VRR Support
Reasons to Avoid
- Lower Peak Brightness Levels
- Higher Input Lag with Different Refresh Rates
- Potential OLED Burn-In
Specifications
Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers No Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type OLED Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type OLED Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 0.03 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 318 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 9,473 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 96 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 90 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 107 All Retailers
- $699.99$1,000Save $300
- $699.99$1,000Save $300
- $699.99
Our Verdict
If you want to maximize responsiveness, the Corsair Xeneon 27QHD240 features an amazing 0.8 ms response time, which is completely unmatched on our list. No matter how hectic anything on screen gets, it will not suffer from blur. While its 13.6 ms input lag seems high, it is much lower at 240 Hz. The included G-Sync and FreeSync tech on the monitor help sync your framerate to the refresh rate, ensuring you’re always getting the smoothest possible experience without any visual tearing.
Although the Xeneon 27QHD240’s OLED panel has a brightness peak of 317.5 nits—slightly lower than some of its LED counterparts—its color performance is exceptional. With 96.1% DCI P3 and an impressive 106.96% sRGB coverage, the monitor boasts vivid, accurate colors that breathe life into the game’s environments and characters, enhancing the overall engagement and realism of the play.
The Xeneon is expensive, make no mistake, but it’s also an exceptional monitor that can perform no matter what you throw at it. With exceptional contrast, great viewing angles, outstanding colors, and phenomenal response time, it’s an incredible investment that’s absolutely worth the money.
Read Less
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
LG 27GP950-B
For Call of Duty fans venturing into 4K territory, the LG 27GP950-B blends high responsiveness with stunning visual clarity, making it a worthy investment for superior gameplay.
True Score
82824Experts
87903Customers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $423$899.99$476.99Read More
Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- 4K resolution delivers great picture quality
- High peak brightness level
- Great color accuracy
- HDMI 2.1 ports for connectivity to modern consoles
- Support for HDR content
Reasons to Avoid
- Low contrast
- Poor reflection handling
- So-so ergonomics
Specifications
Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter n/a Built-In Speakers No Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type IPS Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10, HDR600 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 3840 x 2160 (4k) Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 144 Hz Response Time 1 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 27″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, G-Sync All Specs
Test Results
Brightness (nits) 410 Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) 1,194 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 97 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 88 All Retailers
- $476.99$900Save $423
- $496.99$897Save $400
- $896.99$937Save $40
- $899.99
Our Verdict
For Call of Duty fans looking to dive into 4K gaming, the LG 27GP950-B is an excellent – and expensive – option. With a low input lag of 4.2 ms and a rapid response time of 4.4 ms, it ranks highly in responsiveness, a critical factor for the competitive edges required in Call of Duty’s fast-paced action. The 144 Hz refresh rate, coupled with G-Sync and FreeSync, promises smooth, tear-free visuals, enhancing your gaming experience.
Visual clarity is where the 27GP makes the best case for itself. In addition to its 4K resolution screen, its excellent brightness of 410 nits makes it an excellent option for both dim and brightly lit rooms. The 100% sRGB coverage improves the quality of the visuals, with truer, more vivid colors that are helped by the high brightness.
This monitor doesn’t just excel in gaming; its superior color accuracy and wide gamut offer phenomenal visuals for streaming high-definition content, photo editing, or enjoying movies, making it a versatile tool for all your multimedia needs.
While the LG 27GP950-B comes at a high cost, its 4K resolution and superior performance help justify the price tag. Offering excellent response times, great refresh rates, and exceptional visual quality, the 27GP950-B is a fantastic choice for anyone looking to get into playing CoD at 4K without sacrificing responsiveness and accuracy.
Read Less
Which Criteria Matters for Testing Best Monitors for Call of Duty?
By focusing on these criteria (2 required, 2 nice to have), anyone can quickly and easily compare these computer monitors and how they’ll perform. This helps you make an informed decision and purchase the monitors for Call of Duty.
CRITERIA | RANGE | REQUIRED | DEFINITION |
---|---|---|---|
Input Lag | < 15 ms | Yes | The time it takes for the monitor to register inputs from the user and process them as action. |
Contrast Ratio | >1000:1 | Yes | The difference in brightness between the whites (lit sections) and blacks (dim or unlit sections) of a monitor panel. |
Color Gamut (DCI P3 xy) | > 90% | No (Nice to have) | How much of the DCI P3 xy color gamut is covered by the monitor, which helps indicate color accuracy for HDR content, which includes certain movies. |
Response Time | < 13 ms | No (Nice to have) | The time it takes for a pixel to change from one color to another. |
Our Trusted Data Sources
We looked at 110+ computer monitor reviewers and found that 33 are trustworthy (60%+ Trust Rating). The three we have listed below are our most trusted for computer monitors.
- Samuel Breton – Rtings, MuckRack
- Chris Eberle – Tom’s Hardware, LinkedIn
- Tony Hoffman – PC Mag, MuckRack
Interested in a comprehensive analysis of our data sources? We’ve got you covered. Below, you’ll find a detailed list of every computer monitor review website we’ve identified, organized by their respective Trust Ratings from highest to lowest. But we didn’t stop there. We’ve meticulously reviewed each publication and verified the data by checking whether the authors have bio links to MuckRack or LinkedIn. We’re committed to not only checking the facts but ensuring their veracity.
Computer Monitor Test Data & Results
1. Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) Test Results
Contrast Ratio
> 1000:1
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: How bright the monitor will get, usually under specific testing conditions, like 10% windows (which means 10% of the screen is a white box.)
Units of Measurement: Ratio
Tools to Measure: Luminance meter or photometer or colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
Contrast ratio is how dynamic images are given detail and dramatic effect, with very dark areas appearing truly dark, while bright areas are bright and pop.
Contrast ratio is responsible for making images appear “dynamic” and “dramatic.” By having a good contrast ratio, a monitor is able to recreate dramatic differences between light and dark spots in scenes, images and games accurately.
At a minimum, we recommend a contrast ratio of 1000:1, as this will do a good enough job at allow for detail in dark scenes and images. If contrast ratio gets too low, the picture quality suffers, and the monitor performs worse across the board, no matter the lighting condition. By getting a monitor with a sufficiently high contrast ratio, you can ensure the picture quality doesn’t suffer, and dramatic scenes with stark shifts in lighting, whether they be in games or videos, are created as accurately as possible.
Contrast Ratio (higher is better)
2. Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) Test Results
Color gamut is responsible for making a monitor produce accurate colors when displaying a variety of content. The DCI P3 xy gamut is considered a “standard” gamut of sorts, and is used to help color grade films. Most HDR content will use this gamut at the very least (though other gamut exist) and it’s a commonly used gamut for films.
When it comes to a computer monitor, having a panel that covers at least 90% of the DCI P3 gamut means it’ll output accurate colors when watching HDR content and movies that use the gamut. If a monitor doesn’t cover enough of the gamut, it causes color inaccuracies and shifts the image quality. If you care about maintaining accuracy in the movies you watch so they look the way they were intended, this gamut needs to be properly covered.
Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy)
> 90%
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The amount of the DCI P3 xy gamut that the monitor covers.
Units of Measurement: %
Tools to Measure: Colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
Color gamut coverage is important for ensuring that a monitor is able to accurately output colors. The DCI P3 xy gamut is responsible for making movies and HDR content look the way they were intended.
Color Gamut P3 XY (in %; higher is better)
3. Input Lag (ms) Test Results
Input Lag (ms)
< 15 ms
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The amount of time it takes for a monitor to register an input from the user and display it.
Units of Measurement: Milliseconds (ms)
Tools to Measure: Input Lag Meter
Why It’s Important:
Input lag introduces artificial delay when gaming, which creates a mismatch between your reactions and on-screen action and creates frustration.
Input lag is more of a concern when it comes to gaming, but if you plan on using a monitor for a bit of gaming when you aren’t focused on productivity, editing or other tasks, lower values help improve responsiveness. High input lag means your actions take longer to register on the monitor, effectively introducing an artificial delay to your reactions.
It’s for this reason that we generally recommend an input lag under 15 ms. This ensures the delay that’s introduced has minimal impact on your reactions to what’s happening on screen. It’s important to note that a high input lag won’t have any real effect on anything that isn’t gaming, so it can be safely ignored if you don’t plan on gaming on your monitor.
Input Lag (in ms; lower is better)
4. Response Time (ms) Test Results
Response time measures how long it takes pixels to change from one color to another, often gray to gray. Low response times means the monitor is able to keep up with constant shifts in colors, and helps prevent motion blur from being introduced whatever you’re watching.
We generally recommend a response time that is 13 ms or less, as this will keep motion blur to a minimum, but if you don’t watch a lot of very high intensity videos or play fast-paced games, response time isn’t going to matter much. It’s important to note that monitors will often advertise a 1ms or 2ms or 5ms response time, to name a few, but response time tests measure full color to color shifts, as well as overshoots, which produces different times than what the monitor often claims on the box. This is why response time is a listed spec, but also a testable criterion.
Response Time (ms)
< 13 ms
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The amount of time it takes for pixels on a monitor to shift from one color to another.
Units of Measurement: Milliseconds (ms)
Tools to Measure: Response time tool, camera
Why It’s Important:
Faster response times keep the screen from becoming muddied and blurred when fast-paced action scenes in movies or games start.
Response Time (in ms; lower is better)
Best Monitors for Call of Duty: Mistakes To Avoid
- Disregarding Panel Type: Different panel types (TN, IPS, VA) offer varying levels of color accuracy, viewing angles, and response times. TN panels typically have the fastest response times but poorer color reproduction and viewing angles compared to IPS and VA panels. Choose a panel type that suits your preferences for gaming performance and visual quality.
- Overlooking Resolution: While Call of Duty games can look stunning in higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, they also demand more powerful hardware to maintain high frame rates. Consider your graphics card’s capabilities and prioritize resolution accordingly, especially if you’re debating about the difference between 1080p and 4K for gaming.
- Not Considering Adaptive Sync: Adaptive Sync technologies like AMD FreeSync and NVIDIA G-Sync can help eliminate screen tearing and stuttering, providing a smoother gaming experience. Ensure your monitor supports the adaptive sync technology compatible with your graphics card.
- Focusing Solely on Gaming Features: While gaming-specific features like customizable crosshairs and game modes can be helpful, don’t overlook other important factors like color accuracy, contrast ratio, and viewing angles.
The Best Monitors for Call of Duty Tests Compared
Product | True Score
|
Brightness
|
Contrast Ratio
|
Color Gamut (DCI P3)
|
Color Gamut (sRGB)
|
Input Lag
|
Response Time (ms)
|
Reflections %
| |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $579.99 $650 $70 |
| 86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $754.00 $799 $45 |
| 84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $256.97 $300 $43 |
| 82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $699.99 $1,000 $300 |
| 82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $476.99 $900 $423 |