When you’re looking for the best 32-inch monitor, key features include excellent contrast ratios, wide color gamut coverage, and high brightness. These ensure vibrant, accurate colors and dynamic scenes, whether you’re working in a bright office or watching movies at home. A smooth refresh rate and low input lag enhance your viewing and gaming experience, making interactions seamless and enjoyable.
We analyzed 196 monitors and certified 5 as the best. Our process involved sifting through 319,486 reviews, where 71% of experts were found untrustworthy. Using our True Score and Trust Score, we filtered out fake and low quality reviews, ensuring only high-performing monitors made the cut. These top choices excelled in image quality, responsiveness, and ergonomics, proving their superiority in real-world usage.
How Did We Rank the Best 32 Inch Monitors?
Gadget Review’s buying guide for the best 32-inch monitors is built on a foundation of meticulous research and expert analysis. We analyzed feedback from over 200 websites, diving deep into testing methods and customer experiences to identify the features that matter most. Our true score system synthesizes these insights into clear recommendations, focusing on 2 required test results and 1 must-have specifications. This ensures our guide reflects not just expert opinions but real-world performance and reliability.
Our commitment to unbiased reviews is powered by our ‘True Score’ system, targeting low quality and fake reviews. When you shop through our links, you’re backing our mission. Dive deeper to see how.
?️ Minimum Specifications
- Screen size must be 32″.
? Test Criteria
- Contrast Ratio: 1000:1 or higher (infinite), offering deep blacks and bright whites for an exceptional viewing experience.
- Color Accuracy: At least 90% of the (sRGB or Adobe or DCI P3) color gamut, providing rich and vibrant colors.
Latest Updates
- 04/29/2024: Published the list of best 32 inch monitors based on our True Score system.
Top Best 32 Inch Monitors For 2024
Prices accurate at the time of publishing
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Dell S3222DGM
Offering great value, the Dell S3222DGM combines excellent brightness and contrast with solid color accuracy for a budget-friendly, high-performance productivity and multimedia monitor, though it falls short in its input lag.
True Score
86833Experts
935kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
SAVE $80$329.99$249.99Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Exceptional contrast levels
- Good color accuracy
- Fast refresh rate
- Good reflection handling
- Decent peak brightness levels
Reasons to Avoid
- Poor viewing angles
- Limited ergonomics
- No support for HDR content
Specifications
Display Type VA HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format n/a Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 165 Hz Response Time 2 ms Screen size 32″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Test Results
Brightness (nits) 337 Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) 4,283 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 85 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 98 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 82 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 0 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 18 Response Time (ms) 5 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 27 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 28 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 27 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 26 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 All Retailers
- $249.99$330Save $80
- $279.99$298Save $18
- $319.99$430Save $110
Our Verdict
If you’re looking for a 32-inch monitor on a budget, the Dell S3222DGM is a fantastic productivity monitor with an incredible price tag. It has a solid brightness level of 337.14 nits, making it suitable for office and home environments, especially those with lots of ambient light. Its outstanding contrast ratio of 4282.5:1 also provides outstanding depth to whatever multimedia content you enjoy, with excellent, rich blacks and bright whites.
The S32’s color gamut performance further cements its usefulness as a multimedia monitor. Its DCI P3 xy coverage of 85% gives it great performance when watching movies, while its sRGB coverage of 98.10% makes it excellent for web browsing and web design. The color accuracy pairs well with the 2560 x 1440 resolution, which provides a good balance of clarity and performance for various types of content.
The S32’s biggest compromise is in gaming. While its response time is an excellent, snappy 5.0 ms, the input lag is 18.25 ms, which is not ideal for anything but casual gaming. The high 165 Hz refresh rate and fantastic response time mean the monitor is great for fast-paced media, though.
The Dell S3222DGM offers impressive performance and value, making it a solid choice for anyone seeking a high-quality, affordable monitor. If you need an excellent productivity monitor that works well in an office for any kind of task you can throw at it, or want a monitor for your multimedia PC at home, the S32 is worth picking up.
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
LG 32UL500-W
The LG 32UL500-W is a budget-friendly 4K monitor that excels in color accuracy and low input lag, making it suitable for both creative work and casual gaming, though its lower brightness limits its usability in well-lit environments.
True Score
80792Experts
872kCustomers
Absolutely Fresh
$296.99Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Sharp 4K screen resolution
- High contrast ratio
- Low input lag
- Support for HDR content
- Good color accuracy after calibration
Reasons to Avoid
- Long response time
- Mediocre viewing angles
- Poor ergonomics
- Low refresh rate
Specifications
Display Type VA HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format Yes Max Resolution 3840 x 2160 (4k) Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 60 Hz Response Time 4 ms Screen size 32″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Test Results
Brightness (nits) 230 Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) 2,883 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 94 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 100 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 90 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 71 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 10 Response Time (ms) 8 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 46 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 47 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 36 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 33 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 All Retailers
- $296.99
- $296.99
- $365.00
Our Verdict
If you’re looking for a budget monitor that can pull double duty for work and play, the LG 32UL500-W offers a unique blend of responsiveness and color gamut coverage. With a fantastic input lag of 10.2 ms and a response time of 8.2 ms, it performs excellently when playing fast-paced games. However, it only has a 60 Hz refresh rate, which leaves ultra-smooth, high-frame-rate gaming off the table. The onboard AMD FreeSync keeps the experience tear-free, at least.
The low refresh rate isn’t a problem for creative applications, though. Thanks to its 94.3% coverage of the DCI P3 xy gamut and 100% sRGB coverage, it’s a fantastic productivity monitor that accurately renders web pages and your favorite streaming content. If you do a lot of graphic design work, the wide color gamut and great contrast ratio of 2883:1 means you can work confidently. However, with a lower brightness of 230 nits, the 32UL500 is not great in bright rooms and should be kept in dim or moderately lit offices. If you need something that works better in a bright room, the Asus PG32UQX is extremely bright, though also exceptionally expensive.
Surprisingly, despite its budget price point, the 32UL500 is also a 4K monitor. It’s capable, versatile, and can deliver accurate colors and fantastic responsiveness if you’re willing to compromise on brightness. If you’re looking for a way to merge your work, be it creative design work or basic spreadsheeting, with 4K multimedia and casual gaming, the LG 32UL500-W is extremely hard to argue against, especially given its unbeatable price tag.
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Gigabyte Aorus FI32U
The Aorus FI32U offers 4K resolution and a wide color gamut at a mid-range price. It balances productivity and light gaming capabilities, but it is outperformed in contrast and brightness by competitors at similar or lower prices.
True Score
79796Experts
85618Customers
Mixed Reviews
SAVE $100$749.99$649.99Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Excellent color accuracy
- Great ergonomics
- Wide viewing angles
- High refresh rate
- 4K Screen resolution
Reasons to Avoid
- Low contrast ratio
- Mediocre HDR brightness
- No built-in speakers
Specifications
Available Inputs 3.5mm, DisplayPort, HDMI, USB Bluelight Filter Yes Built-In Speakers Yes Built-In Webcam No Curved Screen No Display Type IPS Flicker Free Yes HDMI Inputs 2 HDR Format HDR10, HDR400 High Dynamic Range (HDR) Yes Max Resolution 3840 x 2160 (4k) Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 144 Hz Response Time 1 ms Rotating Screen Yes Screen size 32″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, G-Sync Test Results
Brightness (nits) 373 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 1,022 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 86 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 123 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 81 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 106 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 64 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 19 Response Time (ms) 4 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 6 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 37 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 37 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 33 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 30 All Retailers
- $649.99$750Save $100
- $649.99$750Save $100
- $1,205.10$1,768Save $562
Our Verdict
If you want 4K fidelity from a 32-inch monitor without breaking the bank, the Gigabyte Aorus FI32U is exceptionally attractive. It features an sRGB color gamut of 105.9% and a DCI P3 of 85.9%, so it’s an excellent pick for web designers. Plus, the 372.1 nits of brightness keep the screen vivid, ensuring lush visuals.
The FI32U stumbles when it comes to contrast ratio, however. AT just 1021.8:1, it’s good, but there are much better options. If you don’t mind downgrading from 4K to 1440p, the Samsung Odyssey G7 is slightly cheaper but much brighter and has over double the contrast.
The FI32U’s primary focus is productivity and editing. With an input lag of 19.3 ms, it’s not well suited for competitive games, but it’ll work fine with casual titles. Thanks to its 144 Hz refresh rate, visual tearing is kept to a minimum if you decide to game on it, and its 4.4 ms response time is excellent for keeping visuals from becoming blurry.
While it’s not quite “budget”, the Gigabyte Aorus FI32U is a solid 32-inch monitor with 4K resolution without the usual premium price. Its great brightness, 4K resolution, fantastic response time, and wide color gamut coverage make it an affordable, efficient balance of productivity, multimedia, and light gaming.
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Samsung Odyssey G7 LC32G75T
The Odyssey G7 provides blur-free, responsive visuals with its high refresh rate and low response time. It is a superb choice for multimedia and casual gaming but not the best for competitive gaming due to its higher input lag.
True Score
79781Experts
855kCustomers
Mixed Reviews
SAVE $185$799.99$615.00Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Outstanding 240 Hz refresh rate
- Very low input lag
- Deep blacks and good black uniformity
- G-SYNC compatibility
- Good peak brightness
Reasons to Avoid
- Poor viewing angles
- So-so 1920 x 1080 resolution
- Very slow response time
- Stand has minimal tilting ability
Specifications
Display Type VA HDMI Inputs 1 HDR Format Yes Max Resolution 2560 x 1440 Panel Type VA Refresh Rate 240 Hz Response Time 1 ms Screen size 32″ Sync Technology AMD FreeSync Test Results
Brightness (nits) 341 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 3,912 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 91 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 83 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 98 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 68 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 10 Response Time (ms) 2 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 32 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 33 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 31 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 31 All Retailers
- $615.00$800Save $185
Our Verdict
The Samsung Odyssey G7 is the best possible way to get responsive, blur-free visuals out of your monitor, perfect for streaming intense movies. With a response time of just 2.63 ms and an impressive refresh rate of 240 Hz, the G7 offers crisp video without visual tearing or muddying.
The G7 also boasts a high brightness of 412.8 nits, guaranteeing vivid imagery and good visibility, even in brightly lit settings. Coupled with a good contrast ratio of 2395:1, the G7 offers rich blacks, bright whites, and dramatic, dynamic scenes. Thanks to its support for HDR, it can easily handle both SDR and HDR streaming and take full advantage of its great contrast.
Thanks to the DCI P3 xy color gamut coverage of 88.7%, the G7 offers good color accuracy with movie content. With an sRGB coverage of 99.23%, it’s a fantastic choice for nearly all the content you encounter on the web.
While the exceptional refresh rate and response time normally make the monitor a natural choice for gaming, the G7 features an input lag of 14.9 ms, which is a bit high for competitive gamers. It’s still plenty fast for casual gaming, but if you’re a hardcore gamer, there are better options, like the LG32UL500.
The mid-range price of the Samsung Odyssey G7 justifies itself with its large 32” screen and strong performance. Its high brightness and contrast ratio, combined with its fast response time and high refresh rate, make it an outstanding multimedia monitor, while its excellent color gamut means it can work very well as a productivity monitor, particularly in web graphics design.
Best Overall
Runner Up
Best Value
Best Budget
Best Mid-Range
Premium Pick
Asus PG32UQX
The Asus PG32UQX stands out for creative professionals and gamers with its premium 4K display, outstanding HDR, and high color accuracy, justified by a high price tag for those seeking top-tier performance and features.
True Score
77776Experts
811kCustomers
Mixed Reviews
SAVE $406$2,299.00$1,893.22Snapshot
Reasons to Buy
- Ultra-wide color gamut for high color accuracy
- High response time and low input lag make it ideal for gaming
- Very ergonomic stand
- High HDR peak brightness levels
Reasons to Avoid
- No HDMI 2.1 port for advanced consoles such as the PS5 and Xbox X Series
- No brightness control in HDR mode
Specifications
Display Type LCD HDMI Inputs 3 HDR Format HDR10 Max Resolution 3840 x 2160 (4k) Panel Type IPS Refresh Rate 144 Hz Response Time 4 ms Screen size 32″ Sync Technology G-Sync Ultimate Test Results
Brightness (nits) 451 Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) 1,315 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) 117 Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) 0 Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) 77 Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) 98 Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) 0 Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) 0 Input Lag (ms) 12 Response Time (ms) 7 Reflections % (Total Reflections) 5 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) 45 Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) 47 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) 31 Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) 32 All Retailers
- $1,893.22$2,299Save $406
- $2,299.00$3,119Save $820
- $2,999.99
Our Verdict
If you’re looking for a premium 4K monitor, the Asus PG32UQX is an excellent choice. With an unbeatable brightness of 451 nits, the PG32 is well-suited to even brightly lit rooms and offices without losing image quality.
This brightness is especially important for a monitor intended to deliver 4K content, though the PG32 does lag behind other options on our list when it comes to contrast ratio, coming in at just 1315:1. It’s far from bad, but if contrast ratio matters most to you, the S32 is much, much cheaper and has almost four times the contrast.
The Asus PG32UQX has a 144 Hz refresh rate and G-Sync Ultimate technology. While these features cater to gaming enthusiasts, they also provide a smooth and responsive experience for general use and productivity tasks. Thanks to its 12.2 ms input lag and great 6.6 ms response time, it also does well with gaming.
If you’re a creative professional, the 97.5% sRGB color gamut is great for creating and editing web media, while the 117% DCI P3 coverage makes the PG32 phenomenal for watching movies and editing videos.
Ultimately, the PG32’s biggest flaw is its price. For the price of just one of these monitors, you could buy three of the second-most expensive monitors on our list and still have change left over. Still, if you want outstanding HDR performance from a monitor that’s excellent for creative tasks and even does well with gaming, the premium price of the Asus PG32UQX is worth it.
Which Criteria Matters for Testing Best 32 Inch Monitors?
By focusing on these criteria (2 required), anyone can quickly and easily compare these computer monitors and how they’ll perform. This helps you make an informed decision and purchase the best 32 inch monitor.
CRITERIA | RANGE | REQUIRED | DEFINITION |
---|---|---|---|
Contrast Ratio | >1000:1 | Yes | The difference in brightness between the whites (lit sections) and blacks (dim or unlit sections) of a monitor panel. |
Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) | > 80% | Yes | How much of the sRGB color gamut is covered by the monitor, which helps indicate color accuracy for web content and games. |
Color Gamut (DCI P3 xy) | > 80% | Yes | How much of the DCI P3 xy color gamut is covered by the monitor, which helps indicate color accuracy for HDR content, which includes certain movies. |
Color Gamut (Adobe RGB) | > 80% | Yes | How much of the Adobe RGB color gamut is covered by the monitor, which helps indicate color accuracy for photos and photo editing. |
Our Trusted Data Sources
We looked at 110+ computer monitor reviewers and found that 33 are trustworthy (60%+ Trust Rating). The three we have listed below are our most trusted for computer monitors.
- Samuel Breton – Rtings, MuckRack
- Chris Eberle – Tom’s Hardware, LinkedIn
- Tony Hoffman – PC Mag, MuckRack
Interested in a comprehensive analysis of our data sources? We’ve got you covered. Below, you’ll find a detailed list of every computer monitor review website we’ve identified, organized by their respective Trust Ratings from highest to lowest. But we didn’t stop there. We’ve meticulously reviewed each publication and verified the data by checking whether the authors have bio links to MuckRack or LinkedIn. We’re committed to not only checking the facts but ensuring their veracity.
Computer Monitor Test Data & Results
1. Contrast Ratio (as ratio, x:1) Test Results
Contrast Ratio
> 1000:1
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: How bright the monitor will get, usually under specific testing conditions, like 10% windows (which means 10% of the screen is a white box.)
Units of Measurement: Ratio
Tools to Measure: Luminance meter or photometer or colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
Contrast ratio is how dynamic images are given detail and dramatic effect, with very dark areas appearing truly dark, while bright areas are bright and pop.
Contrast ratio is responsible for making images appear “dynamic” and “dramatic.” By having a good contrast ratio, a monitor is able to recreate dramatic differences between light and dark spots in scenes, images and games accurately.
At a minimum, we recommend a contrast ratio of 1000:1, as this will do a good enough job at allow for detail in dark scenes and images. If contrast ratio gets too low, the picture quality suffers, and the monitor performs worse across the board, no matter the lighting condition. By getting a monitor with a sufficiently high contrast ratio, you can ensure the picture quality doesn’t suffer, and dramatic scenes with stark shifts in lighting, whether they be in games or videos, are created as accurately as possible.
Contrast Ratio (higher is better)
2. Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) Test Results
Color gamut is responsible for making a monitor produce accurate colors when displaying a variety of content. The DCI P3 xy gamut is considered a “standard” gamut of sorts, and is used to help color grade films. Most HDR content will use this gamut at the very least (though other gamut exist) and it’s a commonly used gamut for films.
When it comes to a computer monitor, having a panel that covers at least 80% of the DCI P3 gamut means it’ll output accurate colors when watching HDR content and movies that use the gamut. If a monitor doesn’t cover enough of the gamut, it causes color inaccuracies and shifts the image quality. If you care about maintaining accuracy in the movies you watch so they look the way they were intended, this gamut needs to be properly covered.
Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy)
> 80%
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The amount of the DCI P3 xy gamut that the monitor covers.
Units of Measurement: %
Tools to Measure: Colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
Color gamut coverage is important for ensuring that a monitor is able to accurately output colors. The DCI P3 xy gamut is responsible for making movies and HDR content look the way they were intended.
Color Gamut P3 XY (in %; higher is better)
3. Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xY) Test Results
Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy)
> 80%
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The amount of the sRGB gamut that the monitor covers.
Units of Measurement: %
Tools to Measure: Colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
The sRGB color gamut is the most commonly used gamut for most colors when browsing the web, watching videos on the web on sites like YouTube, and when playing video games.
Since color gamut comes in a variety of different types, there’s bound to be some confusion as to which is meant for what. sRGB is an extremely common gamut that is used for the vast majority of web content, including how YouTube videos display, and is the primary gamut used for video games.
If you’re looking for accurate colors while web browsing, watching videos or playing games, you’re going to want a coverage of at least 80%. Higher is always better and hitting 100% means that if you correctly calibrate your monitor, you should be seeing content exactly as it was intended. Higher than 100% means that more than just the standard gamut has been covered, which can create more saturated and vivid colors. Coming in under 100% means the colors are less accurate, though this doesn’t become a major issue until you start to fall under 90%.
Color Gamut SRGB (in %; higher is better)
4. Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) Test Results
As the name might imply, the Adobe RGB gamut is mostly focused on photo printing, and was developed by Adobe themselves in order to give users the ability to know how a photo would look if it was printed using standard CMYK printers.
If you’re printing a lot of photos and editing them in most photo programs, this is a commonly used color gamut. By having it be at least 90% covered and properly calibrated, your monitor is able to show you how a photo you’re editing will look when it’s printed out. If the coverage of this gamut isn’t high enough, you’ll suffer the opposite, and may end up wasting a lot of ink on photos that look great on your screen but seem to come out completely off when you print them. If color precision is crucial for your work, especially if you work in a creative field, make sure you have the best monitor for work, which offers precise color accuracy and reliability.
Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy)
> 80%
Acceptable range of performance
Definition: The amount of the Adobe RGB color space that the monitor covers with its panel.
Units of Measurement: %
Tools to Measure: Colorimeter
Why It’s Important:
The Adobe RGB color gamut is important for helping to ensure that photos are printed true to the editor’s intentions.
Color Gamut Adobe RGB (in %; higher is better)
Best 32 Inch Monitors: Mistakes To Avoid
- Ignoring resolution: Consider the resolution of the monitor. While a larger screen size like 32 inches offers ample screen real estate, it’s important to pair it with an appropriate resolution for optimal clarity and detail. Higher resolutions like 1440p (Quad HD) or 4K (Ultra HD) are preferable for larger screens to avoid pixelation and achieve sharper images. For those seeking a balance between size and resolution, exploring our selection of the best 27-inch monitors can be beneficial. If you prefer a more compact option, be sure to explore our recommendations for the best 24-inch monitor, which can provide excellent detail and space efficiency.
- Not considering panel type: Different monitor panel types—such as IPS, TN, and VA—offer varying characteristics in terms of color accuracy, viewing angles, and response times. IPS panels generally provide the best color reproduction and wide viewing angles, making them suitable for tasks like content creation and photo editing. TN panels offer faster response times, which may be preferred for gaming. Consider your specific needs and preferences when selecting the panel type.
- Overlooking refresh rate and response time: If you’re into gaming or fast-paced tasks, pay attention to the monitor’s refresh rate and response time. A higher refresh rate (e.g., 144Hz) and lower response time (e.g., 1ms) can result in smoother motion and reduced motion blur. However, if you prioritize color accuracy over speed, you may not need the fastest specs.
- Neglecting connectivity options: Ensure the monitor has the necessary ports to connect to your devices, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and USB. Additionally, consider features like USB hubs, built-in speakers, or Thunderbolt connectivity if they’re important for your setup. If you care about audio quality and don’t want to invest in external speakers, explore our guide of the top-rated monitors with speakers, which combine great visuals with reliable audio quality.
The Best 32 Inch Monitors Tests Compared
Product | True Score
|
Brightness
|
Contrast Ratio
|
Color Gamut (DCI P3)
|
Color Gamut (sRGB)
|
Input Lag
|
Response Time (ms)
|
Reflections %
| |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $249.99 $330 $80 |
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $296.99 |
| 79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $649.99 $750 $100 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $615.00 $800 $185 | |
| 77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $1,893.22 $2,299 $406 |