The LG 32UL950-W is a premium 32-inch display announced in late 2018. With highlights such as a 4K screen, wide viewing angles, and a low input lag of 9ms, it gets pretty close to competing with some of the best gaming monitors on the market. With a 98% coverage of the DCI-P3 color scale, the monitor’s color accuracy is pretty high, and even though its 60Hz refresh rate is relatively low compared to some of the highest-rated gaming monitors, its large screen provides enough real estate for multitasking. The display also has support for HDR content, and its ergonomics are better than that of the LG 32UL500-W. Its viewing angles are broad, and with a Delta E rating of 0.4, its color accuracy can also get relatively high after calibration.
187
out of
196
Computer Monitors
LG 32UL950-W Review
→
Updated Dec 21, 2023 3:50 PM
Published
True Score
True Score is an AI-powered algorithm of product tests and customer reviews.
71
Mixed Reviews
70
4
Experts
77
235
Consumers
Expert Rankings
(
4
)
While critics were pleased that the LG 32UL950-W had an impressive picture clarity, high color accuracy and a low 9ms input lag, they were not too happy with its low contrast, low refresh rate and poor ergonomics.
Product Snapshot
Overview
The LG 32UL950-W is a premium 32-inch display announced in late 2018. With highlights such as a 4K screen, wide viewing angles, and a low input lag of 9ms, it gets pretty close to competing with some of the best gaming monitors on the market. With a 98% coverage of the DCI-P3 color scale, the monitor’s color accuracy is pretty high, and even though its 60Hz refresh rate is relatively low compared to some of the highest-rated gaming monitors, its large screen provides enough real estate for multitasking. The display also has support for HDR content, and its ergonomics are better than that of the LG 32UL500-W. Its viewing angles are broad, and with a Delta E rating of 0.4, its color accuracy can also get relatively high after calibration.
Rankings (recommended in)
Best For
LG
Consensus
our Verdict
The LG 32UL950-W is a 4K screen resolution display that critics have praised for its having impressive picture clarity. During their experiments, product testers from Gadget Guy were quite impressed with its high color accuracy after calibration, as this had the display deliver rich saturated colors, and had a super low Delta E score of 0.42. They were also pleased that the display had good gaming responsiveness thanks to a low 9ms input lag, and even though its 19.3ms response time was no match for the LG 34GN850-B’s rapid 5.8ms, they were still satisfied since they did not encounter any ghosting during their experiments. Top testers from Monitor Nerds also found out that its viewing angles are better than that of the Samsung G7, and agreed that this made it ideal for group viewing.
However, experts were not pleased with the LG’s poor ergonomics and sub par contrast ratio, as they felt that made its black colors appear gray in a dark setting. They also didn’t like its low 60Hz refresh rate as they felt that this made it unsuitable for gaming, and were also not satisfied with its single 2.0 HDMI port.
ReasonS to Buy
- Sharp picture clarity
- High color accuracy
- Low input lag
- Wide viewing angles
- Good text clarity
Reason to Avoid
- Poor ergonomics
- Low contrast levels
- Low refresh rate
LG 32UL950-W Specs
| Display Type | LCD | |
| HDMI Inputs | 1 | |
| HDR Format | Yes | |
| Max Resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4k) | |
 | Panel Type | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | |
 | Response Time | 5 ms |
| Screen size | 32" | |
 | Sync Technology | AMD FreeSync |
All Specs
Test Results
These are the most important criteria to test for Computer Monitors based on our comprehensive Testing Methodology.
| Brightness (nits) | 412 |
| Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) | 1,336 |
| Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) | 70 |
| Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) | 0 |
| Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) | 99.7 |
| Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) | 85 |
| Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) | 0 |
| Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) | 0 |
| Input Lag (ms) | 9 |
| Response Time (ms) | 8.7 |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) | 39 |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) | 40 |
| Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) | 35 |
| Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) | 32 |
| Reflections % (Total Reflections) | 7.5 |
All Tests
Can You Trust What You Read Online?
Fake reviews are taking over tech journalism—45% of sites are faking product tests. Don’t be misled.
Sign up now for exclusive access to Gadget Review’s bombshell investigation and uncover the truth about tech journalism.
Plus, stay ahead with our daily newsletter, packed with insights you can trust.
Product Comparison
 LG 32UL950-W Review |  LG 32UD99-W Review | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
True Score | 71 | 73 | NR | NR |
Ranking | # 187 / 196 | # 174 / 196 | # / 196 | # / |
Market Context |
The LG 32UL950-W is a premium 32-inch display announced in late 2018. With highlights such as a 4K screen, wide viewing angles, and a low… |
li>Unfortunately, the LG 32UL950-W does not get as bright as the Philips Momentum 436M6VBPAB since it has a peak brightness level of 720 nits, which… li>Unfortunately, the LG 32UL950-W does not get as bright as the Philips Momentum 436M6VBPAB since it has a peak brightness level of 720 nits, which is much more than the LG monitor’s 450 nits. The Philips monitor also has a higher 6888:1 contrast ratio compared to the 32UL950-W’s 2883:1 and is, therefore, more ideal for dark room viewing. |
The LG 32UL950-W(This review) is outmatched by the LG 32UD99 courtesy of its higher 1613:1 contrast ratio, which is better than the 32UL950-W’s 1336:1. The… The LG 32UL950-W(This review) is outmatched by the LG 32UD99 courtesy of its higher 1613:1 contrast ratio, which is better than the 32UL950-W’s 1336:1. The 32UD99 also has slightly better ergonomics and a flicker-free backlight that makes it a lot less difficult to view. |
The LG 32UL950-W gets significantly brighter than the LG 32UN880-B since its 450 nit brightness rating is slightly higher than the 32UN880-B’s 350 nits. With… The LG 32UL950-W gets significantly brighter than the LG 32UN880-B since its 450 nit brightness rating is slightly higher than the 32UN880-B’s 350 nits. With a 98% coverage of the DCI-P3 color space, it is also more capable of a wider color gamut compared to the 32UN880-B, which has a decent 95% coverage. |
Display Type | LCD | VA | – | – |
HDMI Inputs | 1 | 2 | – | – |
HDR Format | Yes | Yes | – | – |
Max Resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4k) | 3840 x 2160 (4k) | – | – |
Panel Type | IPS | VA | – | – |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz | – | – |
Response Time | 5 ms | 4 ms | – | – |
Screen size | 32" | 43" | – | – |
Dig Deeper |
Score Card
E
Expert Score
70
*.75
We place a 75% weighted value on Expert Test Scores
C
Customer Score
77
*.25
We place a 25% weighted value on Customer Scores
True Score
71
Any product with a True Score above 70 is a Mixed Reviews
Expert Scores
Publications with higher Trust Ratings are given more weight.
101.4Category Trust Rating
77The LG 32UL950-W is a good monitor for media creation. The high resolution screen allows… Read MoreBy:
Adam Babcock
36.55Category Trust Rating
NRBy:
Jeff Benjamin
46.6Category Trust Rating
NRBy:
Juli Clover
57.35Category Trust Rating
NRBy:
Paolo Reva
Customer Scores
- 80
(
4.0/5
)
235Ratings
- NR
(
NR/5
)
Ratings
Learn More About Computer Monitors
Computer Monitor Buying Guides_
Latest DEALS_
-
Get the Best Buy Essentials 2-in-1 Charger for $19 (originally $29) – $10 savings
·
-
Get the Kenwood Marine Amp for $140 (originally $349) – $209 savings
·
-
Get the HP Victus 16.1″ for $849 (originally $1,399) – $550 savings
·
-
Get the DeWalt DW735X Planer for $599 (originally $799) – $200 savings
·
-
Get the HP ENVY 6055e for $44 (originally $129) – $85 savings
·