The Mobile Pixels TRIO is an entry-level portable screen that was announced in mid-2020. The 13-inch display may not be as big as some of the highly-rated computer monitors on the market, but it is easy to attach to a laptop and works pretty well as an extra display for users who want to have more screen real estate for increased productivity. It has a decent 1080p screen resolution, and it offers an impressive 169 PPI for excellent text clarity. Its viewing angles are better than those of the AOC E1649FWU, and it is also easy to adjust thanks to its decent ergonomics.
172
out of
196
Computer Monitors
Mobile Pixels Trio Review
→
Updated Dec 21, 2023 3:50 PM
Published
True Score
True Score is an AI-powered algorithm of product tests and customer reviews.
74
Mixed Reviews
72
1
Experts
80
1,166
Consumers
Expert Rankings
(
1
)
The Mobile Pixels Trio had reviewers pleased with its utility as an extra screen, as they complimented its great text clarity and wide viewing angles. However, they didn’t like its low contrast levels, and confirmed that it wasn’t designed for casual gaming due to its low 60Hz refresh rate and lack of support for VRR technology.
SAVE $135
$249.99
$114.89
We’re reader-supported. Commissions finance our mission. Our ‘True Score‘ system independently powers ratings. Learn more
Product Snapshot
Overview
The Mobile Pixels TRIO is an entry-level portable screen that was announced in mid-2020. The 13-inch display may not be as big as some of the highly-rated computer monitors on the market, but it is easy to attach to a laptop and works pretty well as an extra display for users who want to have more screen real estate for increased productivity. It has a decent 1080p screen resolution, and it offers an impressive 169 PPI for excellent text clarity. Its viewing angles are better than those of the AOC E1649FWU, and it is also easy to adjust thanks to its decent ergonomics.
Consensus
our Verdict
Product reviewers commended the Mobile Pixels TRIO monitor for the extra screen space it offers, as they felt that it was ideal for enhancing productivity on the go. After testing, reviewers were delighted with how detailed the content was, attributing this to its high pixel density of 169 PPI, which is much higher than the MSI NXG253R’s 99 PPI. Also, after testing its viewing angles, reviewers from Rtings were happy that images remained accurate even when viewed from a vertical or horizontal viewing angle. The monitor’s brightness level of 261 nits also pleased reviewers during their experiments, and even though it had a limited SDR color gamut (69.4% coverage of the sRGB color scale), they confirmed that this was good enough for content to stay visible in a well-lit setting.
However, the TRIO’s mediocre 981:1 contrast ratio had experts from Monitor Nerds complain that its blacks were not as visible in a dark setting. Also, it doesn’t support FreeSync and G-Sync technology, has a low 60Hz refresh rate, and lacks HDMI ports.
ReasonS to Buy
- Impressive text clarity
- Great viewing angles
- Good screen resolution
- Decent brightness level
- Easy to attach to a laptop
Reason to Avoid
- Low contrast ratio
- No HDMI ports
- Low 60Hz refresh rate
Mobile Pixels Trio Specs
| Display Type | LCD | |
| HDMI Inputs | – | |
| HDR Format | Yes | |
| Max Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) | |
 | Panel Type | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | |
 | Response Time | 31.0 ms |
| Screen size | 12.5" | |
 | Sync Technology | n/a |
All Specs
Test Results
These are the most important criteria to test for Computer Monitors based on our comprehensive Testing Methodology.
| Brightness (nits) | 241 |
| Contrast Ratio (as ratio x:1) | 979 |
| Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 xy) | 0 |
| Color Gamut/Accuracy % (DCI P3 uv) | 0 |
| Color Gamut % (sRGB Coverage xy) | 69.4 |
| Color Gamut % (Adobe RGB Coverage xy) | 51.6 |
| Color Gamut % (Rec. 2020 Coverage xy) | 0 |
| Color Gamut % (Rec. 709 Coverage xy) | 0 |
| Input Lag (ms) | 25.1 |
| Response Time (ms) | 17.5 |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Left) | 27 |
| Horizontal Viewing Angle (Washout Right) | 26 |
| Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Above) | 28 |
| Vertical Viewing Angle (Washout Below) | 28 |
| Reflections % (Total Reflections) | 4.6 |
All Tests
Can You Trust What You Read Online?
Fake reviews are taking over tech journalism—45% of sites are faking product tests. Don’t be misled.
Sign up now for exclusive access to Gadget Review’s bombshell investigation and uncover the truth about tech journalism.
Plus, stay ahead with our daily newsletter, packed with insights you can trust.
Product Comparison
 Mobile Pixels Trio Review |  Lepow Z1 Review | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
True Score | 74 | 59 | 75 | NR |
Ranking | # 172 / 196 | # 196 / 196 | # 27 / 196 | # / |
Market Context |
The Mobile Pixels TRIO is an entry-level portable screen that was announced in mid-2020. The 13-inch display may not be as big as some of… |
The Mobile Pixels TRIO is quite similar to the Mobile Pixels DUEX Plus since they both have a 60Hz refresh rate and a 1080p screen… The Mobile Pixels TRIO is quite similar to the Mobile Pixels DUEX Plus since they both have a 60Hz refresh rate and a 1080p screen resolution. However, the TRIO has a higher 240 nit brightness level compared to the DUEX’s 183 nits, and it also handles reflections slightly better. Also worth mentioning is that the DUEX has a much lower input lag of 9.1ms compared to the TRIO’s 25.1ms, making it significantly more responsive. |
The Mobile Pixels TRIO’s input lag of 25.1ms is nowhere near the 9.1ms offered by the Lepow Z1, so the Z1 feels much smoother to… The Mobile Pixels TRIO’s input lag of 25.1ms is nowhere near the 9.1ms offered by the Lepow Z1, so the Z1 feels much smoother to operate. On the flip side, the Z1 supports HDR content, but the Mobile Pixels TRIO comes out on top thanks to a higher SDR brightness level of 240 nits compared to the Z1’s 212 nits. |
At 13 inches, the Mobile Pixels TRIO is slightly smaller than the 14-inch ASUS ZenScreen MB14AC. Still, the ASUS monitor is better overall thanks to… At 13 inches, the Mobile Pixels TRIO is slightly smaller than the 14-inch ASUS ZenScreen MB14AC. Still, the ASUS monitor is better overall thanks to its significantly lower 8.8ms input lag (compared to the TRIO’s 25.1ms) and its faster 23.9ms response time compared to the TRIO’s 23.9ms. |
Display Type | LCD | LCD | LCD | – |
HDMI Inputs | – | – | Mini HDMI | – |
HDR Format | Yes | Yes | Yes | – |
Max Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) | – |
Panel Type | IPS | IPS | IPS | – |
Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz | 60 Hz | – |
Response Time | 31.0 ms | 34.9 ms | 36.2 ms | – |
Screen size | 12.5" | 13.3" | 15.6" | – |
Dig Deeper |
All Stores
Updated every 24 hours
- Save $135$249.99$114.89
$259.99
Save $211$509.99$299.00
Score Card
E
Expert Score
72
*.75
We place a 75% weighted value on Expert Test Scores
C
Customer Score
80
*.25
We place a 25% weighted value on Customer Scores
True Score
74
Any product with a True Score above 60 is a Meh
Expert Scores
Publications with higher Trust Ratings are given more weight.
101.4Category Trust Rating
58The Mobile Pixels TRIO is a mediocre monitor overall. It’s designed for and best-suited for… Read MoreBy:
Shane Kuhn
Customer Scores
- 82
(
4.1/5
)
524Ratings
- 84
(
4.2/5
)
18Ratings
- NR
(
NR/5
)
Ratings
- 86
(
4.3/5
)
624Ratings
Learn More About Computer Monitors
Computer Monitor Buying Guides_
Latest DEALS_
-
Get the ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED for $699 (originally $1,049) – $350 savings
·
-
Get the HP OMEN Transcend for $999 (originally $1,299) – $300 savings
·
-
Get the Kyota M688 Kizuna for $2,999 (originally $9,999) – $7,000 savings
·
-
Get the La Crosse S77925 Weather Station for $29 (originally $49) – $20 savings
·
-
Get the Turtle Beach Stealth 600 Gen 2 MAX for $61 (originally $119) – $58 savings
·